![]() ![]() This was allegedly done by transmitting an opposite direction flow in the shielding of the wire to cancel out the net magnetic field from going over the rules.į1 last year: Ferrari and the FIA agreed to a mutual 'settlement' which was undisclosed but in short the FIA said they were not happy with the manner in which Ferrari was operating its engine. Also it was said Ferrari ran a false floor that was also designed to pass the static test but move at speed.į1 a few years ago: Ferrari was running something around the coaxial sensor that monitors the amount of electrical power being transferred to the MGU-K. Now there is a spec ECU so that's much harder and the FIA looks at the code you put on it.į1 around 2009 or 10: Ferrari was accused by rivals of using 'Flexi-aero' parts that would reduce drag by bending at high speed but still pass static deflection tests. F1 in the 90's, all the teams were using inertia-based traction control, they were just pretty good at hiding it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |